Index of all articles, click here
By Luc Loranhe (2006)
The constitutions and legal systems of most countries today are based on an intellectual folly that dates back to Western European philosophy of the 18th century. This misconception which has long turned into a dogma and is enshrined in the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights and the constitutions of many countries is: that all humans are equal, and therefore should have equal rights and obligations.
Of course, we are not all equal. Most strikingly, men and women are different, they have different ambitions in life, and their patterns of fulfillment in life are different. Lifelong partnership with one man is of a higher emotional value to women than to men. On the other hand, men are more attracted towards being leaders, and they derive more satisfaction from their sexuality.
The task is to create a just human society that meets the principal ambitions of men and women. Declaring all humans equal, and giving everybody the same rights, does not achieve this. Different rights are important to women versus men, and it simply does not make sense to give men certain female rights they don't care for, or to give women certain male rights, they are not interested in. Likewise, some obligations, degreed by governments or traditions, are suitable to male citizens, and other obligations befit female citizens.
Article 2 of the United Nations' Universal Declaration of Human Rights starts with:
Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. (See: http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html)
The word "sex" (meaning "gender") in this context is based on the above-cited misconception because men and women are different.
For example, in a just society, a woman, or the family of a woman, deserves guarantees that the first man a woman grants sexual access to, or subsequent men (at least for as long as she has not given birth to a child) have serious intentions for a lasting relationship. Such guarantees can either be given financially before sexual access is granted (in the form of dowry), or they can be enforced later on by institutions (which is much less romantic).
Furthermore, women should be granted more rights for financial support from men to whom they grant, or have granted, sexual access, even beyond the duration of a relationship. Men should not have such rights.
In a just human society, rights and obligations should be balanced well between men and women. To give everybody the same rights, and demand the fulfillment of the same obligations, is simply foolish.
(The above text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License.)
Index of articles, click here.
Copyright Luc Loranhe